Introduction
During the financial crisis of 2008-2009, the terms “debt” and “investment” were often confused. One state created a solution plan that allocated hundreds of millions of dollars to increase employment. Recommended measures include isolating buildings and increasing the efficiency of healthcare. At the same time the state sold its interest in a large energy company to pay for the “investment”. Are they mixing content?
Before we discuss debt and/or investments related to tree planting, we must first ensure a solid understanding of these terms.
Make money from Grow your Forest app
1)When the government spends money and no income is generated, it is not an investment. These are costs or expenses. At the moment all the money is spent so that the government can only take on new debt when it charges more taxes or loans. A government that uses an energy company that generates hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue each year and uses this revenue while debt continues to grow. A government that sells the power company and uses that money to raise debt but withdraws its investments is ultimately evil. A farmer sells his cows without any more milk. After using the money from selling livestock, he had to sell his farm.
2)The same principle applies to CO2 based solutions. If we put CO2 into the ground we would not only deprive ourselves of oxygen but we would also be in debt for many years. If the government says we should invest in carbon monoxide, it is taking two different directions. He has to say we need to service the debt to save carbon and oxygen. This debt does not create a return. On the contrary, if the machines are worn out after 20 years we have to spend more money to buy new ones. This solution will only make our people poorer because the money spent on debt cannot be invested. However, the trees will return the product. Planting trees to solve the CO2 problem is not a waste of money; it is an investment. It is a progressive development. Carbon monoxide storage is a poverty-promoting cost.
Wood could be a new financial model
Governments around the world are looking to cope with their financial losses. The gold standard was abolished in March 1973. This could prevent countries from printing money indefinitely and could lead to the next financial crash. Such a system would put thousands of people out of work. The solution to the security problem is closer than the government thinks: wood can replace gold as a currency. If a forest produces 300,000 kilograms of wood per hectare and costs one euro per kilogram, then two billion hectares of forest are worth 600,000,000,000,000 = 600 trillion euros. This amount should be sufficient to ensure that the finances do not take down the trees and that millions of dollars are loaned to improve and maintain the trees as collateral.
How to download Grow your Forest app
Tax-free growth rate:The land is almost destroyed without crops. If you turn this land into a place where food, wood, charcoal, fruit, medicine, extract, oil, essences, pills and many other products can be produced, suddenly the value of the land will increase. Capital growth is attractive and tax-free in many countries. Decision makers will soon realize the greatest results when they realize that unused land can become valuable land.
Download app
It’s a good thing that when wood becomes scarce the price goes up a lot. The same thing happened in 2008 with the price of olive wood. This is based on the fact that building materials such as steel and polymers cost more than one euro per kilogram. As supplies of both household goods dwindle, prices rise sharply. This will increase the demand for wood for other building materials, which will have a positive effect on the price.
Conclusion
Wood takes time:If we plant trees today, we can only cut them down when the world’s population grows by 50%. This means that if we don’t start planting today, there will be fewer trees because we have “overused” the forest, but the demand for trees will increase by more than 50% because there are so many people from that era. It will take 40 years to address this deficit, a growing period.
We can predict that it will take longer because all the good land is being used for food production to support the growing world population. Trees are cut until they grow well = faster. Anyone willing to think long-term, and skeptical about the benefits of Treesolution, can believe the debate surrounding results. Any person, place or country that plants trees now will have a positive economic impact later. Those who think the first tree planting today.